Glitch in the Matrix or Twitter Take-Down?: An Open Letter to Twitter
Dear Kirstine Stewart (Twitter Ppl),
Hello. My name is Dr. Dwayne Winseck, and I’m a professor at the School of Journalism and Communication, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Two weekends ago I had an unpleasant experience — and a suspect one of that – in which my Twitter account was temporarily suspended (#14558974 Twitter Support: update on “CDN University Prof Wonders Why Account Suspended”).
Luckily, through the intermediary of well-known Canadian Internet lawyer Michael Geist my ‘ticket” was brought to the attention of someone who was, until very recently, very high up at Twitter. That person is also someone I admire greatly. Because she/he helped me out so much I’d rather not bring any more trouble to their doorstep, so I shall leave them nameless. Nameless moved my ticket up the ladder within your organization, fast, and by late Sunday afternoon my account was restored.
For all this, I am very thankful. And more to the point, it confirmed my belief that, when faced with tough situations — much tougher than mine — Twitter bends over backwards to do the right thing. This is a point that I’ve made in the past on my blog, notably in a post called, yes, US Subpeona: Twitter Does the Right Thing and several other posts on what I call the Twitter – Wikileaks cases (see here, here andhere).
I’ve also written on this topic for my column at the Globe and Mail, a column that I still hold but no longer use because of frustrations with the abysmal coverage the paper gives to the telecom and media business here in Canada, at least from where I sit. I wrote a column for the Globe and Mail after interviewing Icelandic MP, Birgitta Jonsdottir, and target of the US Department of Justice’s attempt to have Twitter disclose her and two others’ (Ron Gongrijp and Jacob Applebaum) account information in relation to the DoJ’s ongoing investigation of Wikileaks (see here).
Of course, my skirmishes with the big three Cellcos — Rogers, Bell and Telus – in Canada, around which all of this stuff revolves (see below), pales in significance with the Twitter — Wikileaks case. The principle, however, that Twitter stands up for, and at the very least discloses the machinations behind the scenes that implicates its users, is similar.
It is possible, as my colleague and Associate Director at the School of Journalism and Communication, Joshua Greenberg, noted on Twitter the night my account was taken down, that all of this is due to a “Glitch in the Matrix”. However, as he also noted, it could be “punishment for industry criticism”.
It is also possible that I have crossed a line. There is no doubt that some of what I have said has been heated, and pointed, albeit I believe with toes standing close to or even on the line but not over it. Even good friends have counseled caution in this regard, but it would be helpful to know on which side of the line I stand, using Twitter’s terms of service as our guide (see Twitter Rules).
There are likely other possibilities that I haven’t contemplated, and I am keeping an open mind. However, as I stated at the outset, while I am very happy that my account was restored quickly, there are several important questions that still hang in the air, such as:
- Was the temporary suspension a ‘glitch in the machine’, or payback instigated by disgruntled targets of my criticism who took advantage of Twitter’s “report spam” function?
- Either way, what did Twitter find when it investigated my account and made the decision to restore it, and could you let me know the results of your investigation?
- What steps is Twitter taking to ensure that its ‘report spam’ and other features cannot be abused to silence one’s adversaries, or at the very least that such potentials for abuse are being minimized?
I believe these are important questions and I hope you can find the time to address them.
They are important not just to me but to all Twitter users who use your service as a valuable medium of public and, yes, political discourse. That this is so can be gathered, for example, from a post at specialized online forum that deals with mobile wireless issues, Howardforums: The Curious Case of the Suspended Twitter Account. Canada’s premier internet rights and freedom group, Open Media, reposted a modified version of that account on its website: Carleton Professsor Criticizes Canadian Telecom Industry, Gets Twitter Account Suspended.
The issues involved are also important because, sadly, my case is not an anomaly. There are, in fact, several instances in Canada – and likely elsewhere in the world where you are active – where people who are politically active — and reasonably and responsibly so — have found themselves in similar situations.
Critically, not everybody is as fortunate as I am to have immensely supportive colleagues, friends and Twitter followers, to say nothing of high-powered connections of the likes of Michael Geist, and through him, to the very top of the chain at Twitter, to set things aright in quick order. For all involved, we need to know, what is Twitter doing to ensure that it continues to do the right thing?
I have tried repeatedly to directly tweet Kirstine on this matter, as have several others, but with no reply as of yet. After many repeated attempts I thought I would spell it out here in full.
Lastly, that this is a matter of serious public discussion is underscored by the fact that the original report that I authored, and which opened up the windy path to these events, was delivered at one of the Canadian telecom industry’s premier annual conferences, the International Institute of Communication, held at the Ottawa Convention Centre, November 17-18, 2013. A link to the press release put out by Carleton University announcing the original report, Mobile Wireless in Canada: Recognizing the Problems and Approaching Solutions, can be found here, with links embedded to the original report itself.
Of course, I was fully aware that the report would touch a nerve, but what has followed, not just in the ‘mysterious case of the suspended Twitter account’, but across a wide range of matters too long to list, has been wholly unexpected.
As Mark Twain once said, I set out to write you a short letter but I did not have the time so I wrote you a long one instead.
I look forward to hearing back from you at your earliest convenience. I can be reached at email@example.com, via Twitter @mediamorphis or the old-fashioned way by landline to my office: 613 520-2600 x. 7525.
Dwayne Winseck, Ph.D.
Professor, School of Journalism and Communication,
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
- RT @ArielleDRoss: This story's damn impressive "Tracing the path from deadly hand-dug mines in Congo to consumers’ phones and laptops" http… 1 hour ago
- . @BobPickard err, CDN media economy ranks top 10 in world by $; p/h better 2 ask why firm makin 30% margins on wireless wld keep mags goin? 1 hour ago
- Smart ideas by @robynchirps @TheTyee. When big media fail don't cushion blow; help new journalistic ventures grow thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/201… 2 hours ago
- To be borne in mind as CDN 'digital press' fights tooth & nail to constrain @CBC role in 'digital media'… twitter.com/i/web/status/7… 2 hours ago
- Dear CDNs going on bout 'crisis of news': genl news has never survived w/o subsidies: as advertising subsidy fails, Q is what replaces it? 5 hours ago
- Why Bell’s Bid to Buy MTS is Bad News
- A Radical Broadband Internet & Cultural Policy for Canada
- Telus Trifles with Telephone History to Service its Constrained View of Universal, Affordable Broadband Internet Access Today
- Guilty Pleasures and Proper Needs: Who Gets What Kind of Internet, and Who Decides?
- The clash over the Internet infrastructure of the 21st century
- Canadian Newspaper Editorial Endorsements in the 2015 Federal Election: Elite and Out of Sync
- At Bell Media, Editorial Meddling by Execs Appear to be a Recurring Problem
- The CRTC’s Latest Talk TV Decisions: Sweeping Change or Plus Ça Change?
- David Wins Against Goliath: CRTC Bolsters “Net Neutrality”, Limits “Zero-Rating” & Strengthens Local TV
- No Regulatory Cherry-Picking Allowed: the CRTC vs. Netflix Clash @ the TalkTV Hearing
- Arm’s Length or Strong Arming the CRTC?: Minister Moore’s “Mandate Letter” to CRTC Head Jean-Pierre Blais
- Glitch in the Matrix or Twitter Take-Down?: An Open Letter to Twitter
- Carleton Study Challenges Claims of Big Wireless Players and Promotes Need for Maverick Brands
- Growth and Concentration Trends in the English-language Network Media Economy in Canada, 2000-2012
- Growth and Concentration in the French-language Network Media Economy in Canada, 2000-2012
- Why Bell's Bid to Buy MTS is Bad News
- CRTC Kills Bell Astral Deal: What Happened and Why?
- No Regulatory Cherry-Picking Allowed: the CRTC vs. Netflix Clash @ the TalkTV Hearing
- Crony Capitalism?: Revolving Door between Telecom-Media-Internet Industries in Canada and Ex-Politicos
- 4 Phases of Internet Development: From the Open to the Contested Internet
- May 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- September 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010